Nicholas Rescher offers the 1st accomplished chronology of philosophical anecdotes, spanning from antiquity to the present period. He introduces us to the key thinkers, texts, and ancient sessions of Western philosophy, recounting a number of the tales philosophers have used through the years to interact with problems with philosophical predicament: questions of which means, fact, wisdom, price, motion, and ethics. Rescher’s anecdotes contact on quite a lot of themes—from common sense to epistemology, ethics to metaphysics—and supply a lot perception into the breadth and intensity of philosophical inquiry. This publication illustrates many of the methods philosophers all through heritage have considered the problems of their box, and the way anecdotes can paintings to notify and inspire philosophical thought.

Show description

Read or Download A Journey through Philosophy in 101 Anecdotes PDF

Similar Philosophy books

In Praise of Doubt: How to Have Convictions Without Becoming a Fanatic

“A publication of serious useful knowledge by way of authors who've profound perception into the highbrow dynamics governing modern lifestyles. ”—Dallas Willard, writer of understanding Christ Today In In compliment of Doubt, world-renowned social scientists, Peter L. Berger (The Homeless brain, Questions of religion) and Anton C.

Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World

For generations the conventional concentration for these wishing to appreciate the roots of the trendy global has been France at the eve of the Revolution. Porter definitely recognizes France's value, yet right here makes an overpowering case for consideringBritain the real domestic of modernity - a rustic pushed by means of an exuberance, range and tool of invention related in basic terms to twentieth-century the USA.

Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence

Most folk think that they have been both benefited or a minimum of now not harmed by means of being introduced into life. therefore, in the event that they ever do contemplate whether or not they should still carry others into existence---rather than having youngsters with no even considering whether or not they should---they presume that they do them no damage.

Griffin on Human Rights

Human rights are some of the most arguable and extensively mentioned rules in modern politics, ethics, and legislations. In contemporary a long time, the philosophy of human rights has develop into the most vigorous components in philosophy. the most major participants to the talk has been James Griffin, previously White's Professor of ethical Philosophy on the collage of Oxford.

Extra info for A Journey through Philosophy in 101 Anecdotes

Show sample text content

I used to be thrilled with this rationalization, and it appeared to me in a definite solution to be right that brain is the reason for all, and that i proposal that if this is often precise, brain arranging all issues areas every little thing because it is better . . . i presumed he might express me first even if the earth is flat or around . . . and if he stated it used to be in the midst of the universe, he might continue to provide an explanation for the way it was once greater for it to be within the heart; . . . yet as I went on studying I observed Anaxagoras utilizing brain on no account and mentioning no legitimate reasons for the association of all issues, yet giving airs and ethers and waters as explanations and lots of different unusual issues. I felt greatly as I may still believe if an individual stated, “Socrates does through brain all he does,” after which attempting to inform the explanations of every factor I do, if he may still say fi rst that the explanation why I take a seat right here now's that my physique involves bones and sinews, and the bones are tough and feature joints among them, and the sinews might be tightened and slackened . . . and make me capable 31 nichol as rescher to bend my limbs now, and for this reason i've got bent jointly and sit down right here; and if subsequent he should still provide you with different such explanations of my speaking with you, alleging as factors voices and airs and hearings and 1000 others like that, and neglecting to provide the genuine motives. 1 Socrates’s criticism approximately Anaxagoras set the degree for a farreaching and enduring controversy within the historical past of Western philosophizing. For it inaugurated the clash among those that search to give an explanation for the world’s occurrences and preparations at the sole foundation of actual causality and people who envision an explanatory function for ideas of normative rationality. For not like the physicalistic culture of Anaxagoras, there stands the essentially finalistic culture of the Platonic institution of suggestion concerning the rationality of the true. in any case, the actual causality method of nature, whereas fairly powerful in explaining how issues take place on the earth, continues to be in embarrassed silence at the query of why issues take place during this manner. (Leibniz within the 17th century sought to reconcile the 2 by way of featuring that, whereas occurrences can and will be defined physicalistically when it comes to the actual legislation of nature, those legislation themselves can and may be accounted for functionally and functionalistically. ) the debate keeps to the current day and figures at degrees. One is the localized point of human agency—are we people basically complicated machines or has a brand new mechanismtranscending skill emerged during our evolution? And the opposite is the worldwide point of the improvement and structure of the cosmos—is this the fabricated from the feckless interaction of typical forces or is it an issue of clever layout, the fruit now not unavoidably of a fashion designer yet at any cost of a few strength or supplier that operates in an effort to instill order, concord, and rational coherence into the world’s preparations? So in a single means or one other clash among fabric causality and rationalistic teleology has pervaded the whole heritage of philosophy.

Rated 4.47 of 5 – based on 17 votes