By Sebastian Ramon, Philipp Gertz

The idea within the immortality of the soul has been defined as one of many dual pillars of Platonism and is famously defended via Socrates in Platos Phaedo. the traditional commentaries at the discussion by means of Olympiodorus and Damascius supply a different viewpoint at the reception of this trust within the Platonic tradition.

Show description

Read or Download Death and Immortality in Late Neoplatonism: Studies on the Ancient Commentaries on Plato's Phaedo (Ancient Mediterranean and Medieval Texts and Contexts: Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition, Volume 12) PDF

Similar Classical Studies books

Poetics (Penguin Classics)

Crucial examining for all scholars of Greek theatre and literature, and both stimulating for someone attracted to literature within the Poetics, his near-contemporary account of classical Greek tragedy, Aristotle study the dramatic components of plot, personality, language and spectacle that mix to provide pity and worry within the viewers, and asks why we derive excitement from this it appears painful approach.

Early Greek Philosophy (Penguin Classics)

The works accrued during this quantity shape the real origin of Western philosophy—the base upon which Plato and Aristotle and their successors may finally construct. but the significance of the Pre-Socratics thinkers lies much less of their influence—great notwithstanding that was—than of their outstanding highbrow ambition and ingenious achieve.

Discourses and Selected Writings (Penguin Classics)

A brand new translation of the influential teachings of the good Stoic philosopherDESPITE BEING BORN into slavery, Greco-Roman thinker Epictetus grew to become essentially the most influential thinkers of his time. Discourses and chosen Writings is a transcribed choice of casual lectures given through the thinker round advert 108.

The Laws (Penguin Classics)

Within the legislation, Plato describes in interesting element a entire procedure of laws in a small agricultural utopia he named Magnesia. His legislation not just govern crime and punishment, but additionally shape a code of behavior for all elements of existence in his perfect state—from schooling, recreation and faith to sexual behaviour, marriage and ingesting events.

Extra info for Death and Immortality in Late Neoplatonism: Studies on the Ancient Commentaries on Plato's Phaedo (Ancient Mediterranean and Medieval Texts and Contexts: Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition, Volume 12)

Show sample text content

And Westerink (), advert loc. for additional references.  bankruptcy 4 to date, every little thing turns out transparent, yet issues quickly develop into extra complex. At Dam. I. , Proclus is going directly to qualify his place by way of conceding that reminiscence exists in mind ‘not in as far as mind is considering itself ’ (ο μ ν ς αυτ ν νοο ντι; ll. –), because the gadgets of intellection are exact with mind, whereas what's remembered is found in a special topic. 39 reminiscence does although exist in mind ‘as continuously keeping within the comparable factor the participation within the intelligible half ahead of itself ’ ( ς ε σ ζοντι ν τα τ τ ν μ εξιν το πρ α το νοητο ; ll. –). forty Proclus, then, desires to clarify the obvious balance of data that's attribute of reminiscence through putting its paradigm in mind. in contrast to mind, the place topic and item of inspiration are exact, in spite of the fact that, reminiscence is characterised by way of a department among the article that's remembered and the topic which recalls it. Proclus’ account of 2 varied ‘aspects’ of mind at ET  presents the foremost to realizing the feel within which reminiscence could be attributed to mind. forty-one in short, Proclus, like Plotinus ahead of him, acknowledges a type of mind the place topic and item are numerically exact, which he calls the 1st mind or the intelligible mind (νο ς νοητ ς). besides the fact that, in contrast to Plotinus, Proclus additionally introduces a sequence of decrease intellects after the 1st mind, which understand the intelligibles through participation, in as far as they, via pondering themselves, additionally perform what's ontologically sooner than them. Proclus’ thought of view at Dam. I. . – is to make reminiscence in mind reminiscent of the best way subordinate intellects imagine the intelligible sooner than them, with which they aren't exact yet from which also they are by no means bring to a halt, in an effort to converse. Damascius refutes this recommendation of Proclus with a sequence of arguments (at Dam. I. ). opposed to Proclus’ analogy among being-life-knowledge and imperishability-immortality-memory, Damascius means that the 39 The view expressed at Dam. I.  needs to be Proclus’. At Dam. I. . , Damascius refers again to Proclus’ personal admission that strictly conversing, mind doesn't be mindful itself with ς φησιν, ο μ μνηται [sc. νο ς] as a part of his critique of the view that reminiscence exists in mind in any feel. If Dam. I.  provides Proclus’ view, then it's very most likely that the doctrine at Ol. . . – additionally is going again to Proclus. either texts declare that reminiscence exists ‘primarily’ (πρ τως) in mind and depend upon related analogical reasoning. forty be aware the variation among Olympiodorus’ and Damascius’ remedies of Proclus’ perspectives right here: whereas Damascius experiences Proclus as accepting that reminiscence within the mind may introduce a duality among the thing that's remembered and the topic which recollects it, and as a result weakening his place to the assumption of ‘preserving participation in intellect’, Olympiodorus exhibits no trace of such subtlety. forty-one in this complicated topic, see Dodds (), –.

Rated 4.49 of 5 – based on 30 votes